Daniel Lublin, Founding Partner

Daniel Lublin - Toronto Employment Lawyer at Whitten & Lublin Employment Lawyers

Daniel Lublin, Founding Partner


Globe and Mail - Best Law Firms in Canada - Whitten & Lublin Employment Lawyers
Lexpert 2022 - Whitten & Lublin Employment Lawyers

See Daniel Lublin’s Report on Business Column in the

The Globe and Mail Logo linking to Daniel Lublin's G&M articles

Daniel Lublin is a well-known and leading workplace lawyer, media commentator, author, and one of the most recommended employment lawyers in Ontario and throughout Canada.

Mr. Lublin envisions workplace law as a marriage between employer and employee that often leads to breakdown when one side tries to take advantage of the other. Viewing workplace law through this lens enables Mr. Lublin to quickly identify his client’s objectives – and vigorously pursue them.

Daniel Lublin is frequently retained by employees and executives across Canada to provide assistance with their workplace-related disputes and in the negotiation of their employment contracts and severance agreements.  He is regularly consulted by other practitioners for assistance in employment-related matters and for appellate litigation.  He is also often retained by employers domestically and internationally to assist in managing the human resources implications of conducting business in Canada.


Career Highlights

  • Daniel Lublin is a founding partner of Whitten & Lublin. The firm is nationally recognized as one of Canada’s Best Law Firms by the Globe & Mail (and one of the only workplace law firms to receive this distinction)
  • Awarded as one of the Top 10 Employment & Labour Law firms by Canadian Lawyer Magazine in 2018, 2020, and 2022 and the 2016-2019 winner of the Best Employment Law firm by Canadian HR Reporter.
  • Daniel is recognized by the Canadian Lexpert Legal Directory as a “Leading Practitioner” of employment law. Lexpert is the most trusted and authoritative listing of leading lawyers in Canada and selection is determined by a vote conducted among peers.
  • Daniel is selected for inclusion in the 16th Edition (2022) of The Best Lawyers in Canada for Employment & Labour Law. Recognition is based on consensus opinion of leading lawyers about the professional abilities of their colleagues. 
  • Ranked as one of “Canada’s Top Employment Lawyers” by Carswell in every year from 2007 to 2014.
  • The Globe & Mail’s workplace law columnist both in print and online, since 2012.
  • Awarded the 2011 “Precedent Setter Award” recognizing him as one of the best of the new generation of lawyers in Ontario.
  • Frequent appearances on national television and radio, as a commentator for workplace legal issues.
  • Published over 700 national newspaper articles since 2005.
  • National Columnist for Metro newspapers from 2006 to 2013.
  • Author of Canada’s first legal text on Independent Contractors, published by Carswell in 2013.
  • Named the “Lawyer of the Week” by The Lawyers Weekly in December, 2008.
  • Past Chair of the Law Society of Upper Canada’s Employment law program for paralegals.


Courtroom Success

Mr. Lublin is a courtroom lawyer. He represents both employees and employers in all workplace-related legal disputes and human rights matters – with an emphasis on litigation. Some of his reported courtroom decisions include:

Kraft v. Firepower Financial Corp, 2021 ONSC 4962, prevailed in a case against a financial firm that tried to deny payment of the largest ever commission earned by an ex-banker and also obtained a 10-month severance package for an employee with 5 years’ service, including additional payments due to the impact of Covid-19.

Yee v. Hudson’s Bay Company 2021 ONSC 387, successfully argued the first known Canadian case to address the impact of COVID-19 on severance awards and secured a 16-month severance package and bonus to a terminated executive of HBC, following a trial.

Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports, (2017) ONCA 158: prevailed in Ontario’s leading case on employment contracts, decided by the Court of Appeal.

Lau v. CGI, 2018 HRTO 643, successful application to join together a group human rights proceeding alleging systemic and group discrimination, at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.

Downtown Kids Academy Inc. v. Zakrzewski 2017 ONSC 5045, successful defence of an injunction application alleging a violation of a non-solicitation clause, brought against a new business owner by her former employer.

Ozorio v. Canadian Hearing Society, (2016) ONSC 5440: successfully doubled the severance package offered to a 30 year senior manager, to 24 months, with the court’s recognition that older and long-term employees should receive significant severance awards to compensate for their age and long service.

Tetra Consulting versus Continental Bank of Canada, (2015) ONSC 4610: successfully obtained a large wrongful dismissal judgment on behalf of a senior bank executive; and see Tetra Consulting v Continental Bank et al., 2015 ONSC 6546: where the defendant was ordered to pay extraordinary legal costs to Mr. Lublin’s client due to its defence strategy.

Buaron v AcuityAds Inc., 2015 ONSC 5774: Successfully convinced a court to strike down an employment contract that attempted to limit Mr. Lublin’s client to only minimum severance and obtained damages for wrongful dismissal due to the termination.

Markoulakis v SNC-Lavalin Inc., 2015 ONSC 1081, secured one of the highest ever wrongful dismissal judgments in Canadian history, against SNC Lavalin, obtaining a 27-month severance award following the termination of a senior civil engineer after 41 years’ service.

K.P. v Oracle Canada ULC, successful wrongful dismissal lawsuit on behalf of senior sales executive, against Oracle Canada.

Ledford v. Friendly Times, 2014 HRTO 70, successful defence of human rights lawsuit alleging age discrimination.

Morgan v. Herman Miller Canada Inc., 2013 HRTO 650 – Prevailed in a two-week human rights trial concerning discrimination on the basis of race and reprisal, resulting in a significant award of damages for a terminated employee.

Hussain v. Suzuki Canada Ltd., 2011 Carswell Ont 12251 (ON S.C.) – one of the highest ever severance awards in Canada (a 26-month severance package) given to Suzuki Canada’s longest-serving employee.

Cardenas v. Kohler Canada Co., 2009 CanLII 17976 (ON S.C.) – one of the largest group wrongful dismissal judgements in Canadian history, where Mr. Lublin successfully obtained nearly $1 million in damages for five terminated employees.

Adjemian v. Brook Crompton North America, 2008 CanLII 27469 (ON S.C.), a precedent-setting case at the Ontario Court of Appeal confirming that wrongful dismissal cases can and should be heard in an expedited fashion.

Camaganacan v. St. Joseph’s Printing Ltd., 2010 ONSC 5184 (ON S.C), prevailed in wrongful dismissal case, securing a 16-month severance package for a client who was only offered only 6 months by his employer.

Nasager v. Northern Reflections Ltd., 2011 ONSC 5872, which is an appeal court case, where Mr. Lublin successfully upheld a judge’s decision that his client should be awarded a 6-month severance package where the employer gave him only 5 weeks.

Corporate Investigative Services v. Steele et al. 2012 ONSC 3286 (ON S.C.) – Successful defence of a summary judgement motion in a large corporate action involving two competing security companies.

Harvey v. Shoeless Joe’s, 2011 ONSC 3242 (ON S.C.) – Successful defence of a wrongful dismissal claim from a former executive.

Napolitano v. Friendly Times Child Care Centre, 2012 HRTO 603 – One of the few cases dismissing a human rights application from an ex-employee on a summary hearing.

Hayes v. Peer 1 Network Inc., 2007 CanLII 65614 (ON S.C.D.C.) – wherein Mr. Lublin successfully overturned a lower court’s decision to move his client’s case to British Columbia, instead of Ontario where the client resided.

Select Media

Sample of articles written by Daniel Lublin as the Globe and Mail’s Workplace Legal Expert

Is your employment lawyer the real deal?

Things to look out for when finding and hiring the right employment lawyer for yourself.

The ins and outs of job severance

Some common misconceptions about severance packages and the dismissal by your employer.

Can my employer force me to sign a non-compete or non-solicitation clause?

Non-compete clauses are often considered excessive and are rarely upheld, but non-solicitation agreements are a different story.

What to do when your position is eliminated

You may have a claim for constructive dismissal if your employer changes your job in any significant way, including changed hours of work, reduction in compensation, changed responsibilities, and changed work location.

What are the rights of a worker on indefinite sick leave?

You cannot be fired because you are sick, but employees who do not work are not entitled to pay unless it is guaranteed in their employment contract.

Employment Contracts

The biggest mistake you can make when changing jobs is to agree to an unfavorable employment contract. Be on the lookout for probation, termination, contractual changes, non-solicitation, and non-compete clauses.

Other publications include:

  • The Globe and Mail, “Wrongfully fired employees can work together to help end age discrimination“, Nov 23, 2018
  • The Globe and Mail, “Is your employment lawyer the real deal?“, May 2, 2012
  • The Lawyers Weekly, “Workplace game change”, March 7, 2014
  • The Law Times, Employer’s aggressive defence tactics come with hefty price tags, November 2015
  • The Lawyers Weekly, “Challenging the “right” to telecommute”, May 17, 2013
  • Toronto Star, “RBC apologizes to outsourced workers”, April 11, 2013
  • Toronto Star, “Ottawa approved foreign workers to replace RBC Employees”, April 8, 2013
  • CTV National News “Class action lawsuits over unpaid overtime”, March 22, 2013
  • CTV’s Canada AM “Ask a Lawyer”, February 27, 2013
  • Canadian HR Reporter, “Relationship Problems at Work”, February 26, 2013
  • Law Times “Who owns employees social media accounts”, Nov 2012
  • Readers Digest “How Maternity Leave is failing Canadian Woman”, August 2012
  • The Toronto Star “Would you reveal your Facebook password for a job”, March 21, 2012
  • The Lawyers Weekly “Offering only the minimum a ‘costly gamble’, March 2, 2012
  • Canadian Business Magazine, “The dark side of maternity leave”, September 14, 2011
  • Law Times, “Lawyer’s letters can be perilous“, September 5, 2011
  • Toronto Star, “High profile resignations work for some”, July 15, 2011
  • The Lawyers Weekly “Terminating long-term employees”, July 8, 2011
  • The Toronto Star, “Social media leaves trail for bosses”, July 6, 2011
  • The Globe and Mail, “When push comes to shove: mandatory retirement”, May 13, 2011
  • Canadian HR Reporter, “Employee wins back unilateral pay cuts”, January 17, 2011
  • The Toronto Star, “What you do outside of work can get you fired”, May 10, 2011
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, “When a manager isn’t a ‘manager’, April 6, 2011
  • The Globe and Mail, “Computer ruling seen as landmark workplace decision”, March 26, 2011
  • The Globe and Mail, “Employment contracts: what you need to know”, January 8, 2011
  • National Post – Young Entrepreneur Spotlight, December 2010
  • University of New Brunswick Law Journal, Issue 59 “Wrongful Dismissal: bad faith damages in Canadian employment law”, 2009
  • Canadian Compensation and Benefits Reporter, “Employer pays 10K in equity case”, October 2010
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, “Court slashes damages for Bell manager’s assault”, June 30, 2010
  • Canadian Corporate Counsel Magazine “A new bar for safety on the job” summer, 2010
  • Canadian Employment Law today, “Get out the swear jar at work”, June 16, 2010
  • Law Times, “Assessing the validity of employee bonuses”, June, 2010
  • Canadian Employment Law today “Court slashes damages for manager’s assault” June, 2010
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, “Paranoid employer goes too far” January 13, 2010
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, “Employer not to blame for employee’s mental breakdown” April 9, 2008
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, “Silence may not always be golden” June 18, 2008
  • Globe and Mail, Job Security on Leave, May 6, 2009
  • CTV.ca, “NDP wants more EI for new moms” April 28, 2009
  • National Post “It’s not just a fear: you’ve been laid off” February 3, 2009
  • Toronto Star “Family Day confusion still reigns” February 14, 2009
  • The Lawyers Weekly “Names in the News” December 19, 2008
  • The Lawyers Weekly “Resolving termination disputes by summary judgment” May 22, 2009
  • The Canadian Employer “ask an expert”, February 2008
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, Issue 534 “No room for funny business”
  • Canadian Employment Law Today, Issue 541 “Job posting unreasonable step” Canadian Employment Law Today, Issue 525 “Squeaky wheel gets released”
  • Toronto Star “Worries follow rise of Facebook” May 4, 2007


Daniel Lublin can be reached at dan@whittenlublin.com

Do you need workplace legal advice?

Whitten & Lublin Employment and Labour Lawyers is a nationally recognized team, assisting employees in all aspects of workplace legal disputes. Don’t take a chance with your case. Consult the law firm with a team of proficient employment and labour law lawyers.

Whitten & Lublin Toronto Employment Lawyers

Toronto & GTA: (416) 640-2667

Consult With Us