Family Status Discrimination Ontario

Not Offering Reasonable Accommodation of Childcare Responsibilities as a Human Right in the Workplace Falls Under Family Status Discrimination.

Under the Ontario Human Rights Code, childcare obligations are covered under family status as a prohibited ground of discrimination. Within the workplace, this means that a policy or working arrangement (i.e. hours or change in scheduling) may have an unintended effect of discrimination upon an employee’s childcare obligations. There are standards that must be met prior to establishing that an employer must accommodate an employee’s childcare needs. Here are those standards in general terms:

The employee must first prove that the workplace policy in question does in fact adversely affect their childcare responsibilities. To meet this standard, the employee must establish that the child is under their legal care and that they are responsible for the child’s care. Being a parent or legal guardian undoubtedly meets this criterion. There must also be a reasonable effort to make alternative childcare arrangements by the employee. This may include arranging for daycare, a relative or spouse to care for the child during required hours of work, and so forth. If such arrangements are not possible, the employer then has the duty to provide ‘reasonable accommodation’ to the point of ‘undue hardship’.

‘Undue hardship’ is an elusive standard that many times requires the advice of an experienced employment lawyer. This does require, however, for an employer to make a meaningful effort to accommodate childcare needs. This may include a flexible scheduling arrangement, for instance, that would allow the employee to fulfill their work obligations and meet their childcare duties. If the accommodation can be made without hurting the business, then the employer unquestionably must provide accommodation.

For example, suppose an employee had always worked a shift of 8 am – 4 pm. Eventually, this employee is required to work from 12 pm – 8 pm. The employee puts forth an effort to arrange for relatives to care for the child during the evening, however, this is unsustainable. There are also no daycare options available during this time. If the employer can provide the employee with a scheduling alternative to accommodate childcare needs without hurting the business, then the employer here must accommodate. When the business may suffer is where the standard becomes more uncertain. For instance, how much hardship is the employer required to sustain in making accommodations? If you are faced with such a situation, please seek the assistance of Whitten & Lublin’s team of proficient employment lawyers.

Read our other human rights and discrimination articles for more information.

Whitten & Lublin Employment & Labour lawyers have represented thousands of people who have faced family status discrimination, in and out of the courtroom, and we have a well-deserved reputation of knowing what it takes to get the job done right. This is why we are rated one of the GTA’s most recommended labour and employment lawyers and we have the testimonials from our past clients to prove it.

Don’t leave your constructive dismissal case to chance. Consult with a lawyer with the right skills and experience at Whitten & Lublin Employment & Labour Lawyers. To book a consultation please contact us online or by phone at (647) 946-1278 today!  

Do you need workplace legal advice?

Whitten & Lublin Employment and Labour Lawyers is a nationally recognized team, assisting employees in all aspects of workplace legal disputes. Don’t take a chance with your case. Consult the law firm with a team of proficient employment and labour law lawyers.

Whitten & Lublin Toronto Employment Lawyers

Toronto & GTA: (647) 946-1276

Consult With Us